11 days until Milton votes. Monday 26 October 2026. Everyone on the ballot, what each has filed, and what they say in their own words — see the ballot.
Candidate for Town Councillor, Ward 1 · filed Aug. 20, 2026
| Office sought | Town Councillor, Ward 1 |
|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug. 20, 2026 |
| Status | On the ballot |
| Campaign site | https://www.youtube.com/@reallyrah4milton |
| Email filed with the Clerk | [email protected] |
Source: the Town's certified candidate list. Contact details are those the candidate themselves gave the Clerk.
For each theme: what the candidate answered, what their own website says, and what the council record shows if they have sat on Council. The three are set beside each other and left there. Nothing is scored, and no conclusion is drawn on the reader's behalf.
Where their own site speaks to one of these questions the sentence is quoted under that question. Everything else it says is set out in From their site.
Do you support the Official Plan as adopted? If not, what specifically would you seek to change?
I want to support well-researched, well-argued proposals, but I have real concerns when suburban sprawl is on the table. I care deeply about the Greenbelt and want to explore every method to preserve it while still leaving room for development that genuinely makes sense. This also has to include legislation that makes it easier for small businesses to diversify local employment, so no single industry has outsized sway over the town. Think mixed-use development: a little of everything, and incredible tax revenue to go with it.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Where in your ward do you believe higher density belongs — and where doesn't it?
Higher density belongs where people actually want to live, not just where it's convenient to build. Too often the latter wins out. That said, congestion solutions need to be in place before approvals are given, otherwise the rollout causes real problems. People want to be near Main Street, but if density gets added before congestion is solved, traffic will be horrible.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
When a development application conflicts with community opposition but complies with the Official Plan, how do you decide?
Milton is going through growing pains, and I'd rather face that head-on than pretend it isn't happening. When there's real friction between a developer and a community, I expect conspicuous kindness from whichever side is entering the relationship, sometimes that means unfavourable terms or taxes for the newcomer, sometimes it means cooperating well beyond what staff require. At the same time, when opposition represents only a small slice of the community, it's hard to treat it as a mandate. I trust residents who've done their homework and are willing to talk. My job is to mediate that conflict, not put my thumb on the scale. There are people with more expertise and more lived experience in this community than me, and I intend to lean on them.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Milton is hitting its housing targets. Is that the right target, too low, or too fast?
Housing demand is largely out of our hands, that's set by immigration policy, but housing type is within our control. More people are coming to Milton whether we like it or not, and we need to service them at the lowest reasonable cost to tax revenue. I'll support whichever housing types make sense for fiscal sustainability and community cohesion.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What is one concrete action council can take to improve attainability for first-time buyers and renters, not just supply volume?
This is one of my biggest concerns. Any real solution here will be unpopular with investors and speculators, and could bring some volatility to home prices. One option for first-time buyers and renters is more multi-unit building types, though even that draws investor interest and pushes cost back up. It's not a clean fix, but it will at least give first-time buyers a different set of pricing options.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Should Milton use tools like inclusionary zoning, pre-zoning around transit, or reduced parking minimums? Which, and where?
Simple: I'm for whatever helps someone with an enterprising spirit get a home, a business, or an idea off the ground. That means letting businesses in denser areas operate under different requirements than rural ones, and letting business size shape the rules too. We shouldn't copy-paste the same regulations onto areas with completely different needs, lots of parking makes sense in rural zones, less makes sense near transit. A one-size-fits-all rule only serves whoever's too lazy to write a better one.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What, specifically, can a Milton council member do to advance all-day two-way GO service beyond passing motions?
Pushing Metrolinx is a real option. Building transit-oriented communities near the stations gives them a financial reason to justify expanding service. Solving the "last mile" problem will also go a long way toward convincing commuters they can rely on transit fully.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Would you support increasing Milton Transit's budget and service hours, and how would you pay for it?
Yes, if it's done thoughtfully. Understanding how people actually move through Milton is essential to designing a transit system that works, and we can't afford to be wasteful. If an investment doesn't reduce traffic load where it's needed, it's hard to justify the cost. The developments around transit hubs stand to benefit most, so I believe that's where most of the funding should come from.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What is the single worst traffic pinch point in your ward, and what is your fix?
This is hard to pin down because it depends so much on individual schedules. Encouraging higher-density transportation options could ease congestion everywhere. One tool worth exploring is the "road diet": converting a four-lane undivided road into a three-lane cross-section, one travel lane each direction plus a shared center turning lane, often with a slip lane or right-turn channel at intersections to keep traffic moving smoothly.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Growth-related revenue is shrinking. Rank your preference: higher property taxes, more debt, deferred projects, or reduced service levels — and defend it.
I'd resort to deferred projects, then reduced service levels. That's a stark admission on its own, if a municipality can't withstand a dip in growth revenue without immediately halting progress or slashing standard services, it proves the baseline budget was built on an unsustainable, inefficient foundation rather than resilient fiscal management. Higher property taxes and more debt only fuel that same spending habit with no regard for efficiency.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What tax increase range do you consider acceptable for 2027, and what would justify exceeding it?
The key is making sure our taxes don't grow faster than the actual cost of services, the two have to move together. If service costs go down, tax growth should follow. And as assessed property values rise, the tax rate should adjust down proportionally, so owners aren't paying more just because their assessment went up on top of the rate itself.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Name one Town expenditure you would cut, or one you would add.
Easy one for me, I love native plants and pollinators. We should reduce mowing in areas with essentially no foot traffic, keeping it along roadsides for sightlines. We should also end practices like mulch mountains, which actively kill trees and leave us paying to replace boulevard trees every few years. These are small, low-visibility changes that save real money for almost no downside.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Healthcare and schools are not municipal responsibilities, but residents feel the gaps locally. What is your advocacy plan, and how will residents measure whether it worked?
This is town business no matter your politics. Provincial and federal debt is climbing, and it's our residents who feel the gap first, face to face. We should advocate for responsible spending at higher levels of government to ensure our community's health.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What is your position on the Milton Education Village's priorities and timeline?
For Milton's economy to diversify, we need room for people who innovate. My hope is that the students we're hosting help bring some of that here.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What recreation or community facility gap would you prioritise next, and where?
What's missing is support for childcare. We live in a world where a two-income household is the norm, and if childcare costs as much as a job pays, families are stuck choosing between earning income and spending those early years with their kids. I'd support almost anything aimed at children under ten. They have the capacity to become what we can't, so let's back them.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
How should council balance aggregate and quarry operations against groundwater and community concerns?
Milton's growth needs gravel, that's just true. But if a quarry threatens our shared groundwater, and the vegetation and natural heritage that depend on it, it shouldn't move forward unless the operator is prepared to cover the worst-case scenario the community identifies. There are only a handful of places in North America with thousand-year-old trees, only a few where nut trees grow like weeds. That's what we have here, so damage to the water table isn't a small risk, it's a threat to something genuinely rare. I understand quarries are necessary. I also know there's only one Escarpment.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What is your commitment to rural Milton on roads, internet, and service equity?
I live in rural Milton, so these aren't small issues to me, they're how we stay connected to the rest of the community. Our roads have different needs, spring thaw alone makes that clear. Internet here has improved, but it started from overpriced and unreliable, so there's still a long way to go. Service equity is genuinely complicated because the challenges out here differ so much from suburban Milton's.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Should Milton's urban boundary expand further within this term? Under what conditions?
I wouldn't support expansion in my own ward; for the most part I think it would be the wrong call. I do support reasonable density through ARUs, but not further disturbance to farmland or forest. If the urban boundary expands at all, I believe it should go toward Mississauga, given the pressure already coming from industry there. Any expansion elsewhere should have to clear a much higher bar of benefit to the town before I'd consider it.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Would you use, or support the use of, strong mayor powers? Under what circumstances?
I'm wary of any strong-arm governance. If department heads give in to corruption, or council backs a measure the public clearly opposes, those are the moments that concern me. The mayor should always act with the community's interest first. If a mayor starts using those powers to act like the "king" of the town, that's a serious problem, and one I'd hope voters correct at the next election.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What is one specific change you would make to how council engages residents between elections?
More transparency in how decisions get made, and real engagement with community organizers from a range of backgrounds on the big issues: official plan reviews, transit overhauls, city-wide budget frameworks. That engagement should use every channel available: social media, classroom visits with students, door hangers and mail. The goal is to cast the widest net possible so no one feels left out.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What does Milton need more right now — continuity or change — and why are you the answer?
If Milton's growth were limited, I'd choose continuity. But it isn't, it's expanding fast, and that changes how we deliver services and how we approach nearly everything. Some people want Milton to stay a farming town, some see a city on the horizon, some understand it's a journey that takes a lifetime. We're growing at breakneck speed, and the approach that worked for decades can't be the approach going forward. We can move slowly, but that won't remove the need to change, it'll just make the eventual cost higher.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
What is the first motion you would bring forward?
Building bylaws, done better. Keep the application process itself the same, but reduce or defer the fees for small businesses. The time burden alone is a lot to ask of someone without experience navigating permitting; add a financial burden on top and most people would rather skip the process altogether. For the town's sake, we want people telling us how they plan to build or grow their business, not avoiding us. This removes a major hurdle for Milton's most ambitious residents and leaves the town better informed at the same time.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Name a vote from the 2022–2026 term you disagreed with, and what you would have done instead.
Childcare funding advocacy, back in 2024, which ultimately got voted down. I believe it's our job to advocate for people struggling on the ground, regardless of which level of government technically owns the issue. Milton has a demographic makeup that calls for additional support for our most vulnerable children. I'll happily step on toes to make sure those children's needs are met, and that their parents get some peace, because they're too busy raising a family to referee a fight between levels of government.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Would you support large-scale data centres being developed in our municipality, and what would make you support or oppose a specific project?
A hard no, unless it does a tremendous amount to support the town's growth. That barrier of entry will hopefully make it unappealing to data centres that care little for the town's long-term health. If they mean well then I'll be willing to change my mind.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
How would you weigh the economic benefits of a data centre against its use of land, electricity, water, and other municipal infrastructure?
Data centres, like any other large business, should be a net benefit to the town long term. If they offer limited employment, the town needs to be compensated in other ways, measured against their use of electricity, water, and other municipal infrastructure.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Should the municipality actively pursue data-centre investment, or only consider proposals as they come forward?
The town is already busy enough managing the services we have. Let's address data centres as they approach us, rather than chase them.
Their website does not address this question. Most campaign sites do not address most specific questions. What it does say →
Accounts linked from the candidate's own website or filed with the Clerk. Nothing here was found by searching for their name: guessing at an account and attaching it to a real person is a mistake worth avoiding entirely. These are links out, not content read or quoted here.
What they said in answer to the questions themselves is under Where they stand, question by question.
Captured 2026-10-06 from https://www.youtube.com/@reallyrah4milton. These are the candidate's own words on their own site, not a summary written here. Campaign sites change; this is what it said on that date.
Written by other people, not by this site. Headlines and links only, with the outlet and date. Where a piece quotes them directly, that quotation is printed word for word and checked against the article it is attributed to.
None of this changes anything else on this page. A reporter’s summary is their compression of what was said, not the member’s own words, so nothing here is recorded as a position or compared against one. Where they are quoted directly, those words are theirs — and they are shown here rather than folded into a stance they did not write.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
This is a record of what the Town certified and what the candidate publishes themselves. It contains no rating, ranking or endorsement, and no assessment of any candidate. Corrections are welcome and acted on within 48 hours — see the methodology page.
Everyone else on this ballot line, in alphabetical order.
16 of the 44 candidates who could be reached have answered the same 26 questions. Replies are open until Sunday 11 October 2026. 1 other candidate publishes no contact address anywhere, so they could not be asked. Read the answers, and who has answered → · the questions
One email a week with what moved on the record, Ward 1 first. No spam, one click to leave.