11 days until Milton votes. Monday 26 October 2026. Everyone on the ballot, what each has filed, and what they say in their own words — see the ballot.
Candidate for Mayor · filed Aug. 14, 2026
| Office sought | Mayor |
|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug. 14, 2026 |
| Status | On the ballot |
| Email filed with the Clerk | [email protected] |
Source: the Town's certified candidate list. Contact details are those the candidate themselves gave the Clerk.
For each theme: what the candidate answered, what their own website says, and what the council record shows if they have sat on Council. The three are set beside each other and left there. Nothing is scored, and no conclusion is drawn on the reader's behalf.
Where their own site speaks to one of these questions the sentence is quoted under that question. Everything else it says is set out in From their site.
Do you support the Official Plan as adopted? If not, what specifically would you seek to change?
No answer to this question.
Where in Milton do you believe higher density belongs — and where doesn't it?
No answer to this question.
When a development application conflicts with community opposition but complies with the Official Plan, how do you decide?
If no compromise can reconcile the development application with community opposition and the official plan, I would still choose to proceed, as development should not be stopped solely because of community concerns. For example, in an effort to make Milton a more affordable city for incoming residents, increased mixed-use zoning development opportunities may lower property values for existing residents who may protest. In this case, the development would benefit the community as a whole, for the sake of property values affecting few within the community. Similar to the question presented, the case example I provided demonstrates a very binary problem and does not reflect real conditions that will often occur between community opposition and other stakeholders. In reality, I would reflect strongly on the community's concerns and attempt to find solutions that satisfy both parties or mitigate potential issues.
Milton is hitting its housing targets. Is that the right target, too low, or too fast?
No answer to this question.
What is one concrete action council can take to improve attainability for first-time buyers and renters, not just supply volume?
No answer to this question.
Should Milton use tools like inclusionary zoning, pre-zoning around transit, or reduced parking minimums? Which, and where?
Milton is a rapidly growing city with the population set to exceed 400, 000 residents by the year 2050. To reduce the housing strain Milton will face, it is important that the city implement several measures to ensure that incoming residents will have the ability to afford good housing conditions. This means using planning tools such as density bonusing and even inclusionary zoning in some areas. Pre-zoning could be an option as well, particularly near transit corridor hubs in the city, but only where residents, and businesses agree upon it. For parking, I would not support a one-size-fits-all minimum across Milton in areas with strong transit access, particularly around major transit hubs. I would rather that the city work towards improving transit infrastructure to meet that demand that would otherwise be required of parking minimums.
What, specifically, can a Milton council member do to advance all-day two-way GO service beyond passing motions?
No answer to this question.
Would you support increasing Milton Transit's budget and service hours, and how would you pay for it?
I would support increasing the Milton Transit budget and service hours for a variety of reasons that would benefit both citizens and local businesses. To pay for these services, however, it does not need to significantly hit the taxpayer, as I believe a shift in budget priorities is needed to pay for the increased service. For instance, oftentimes transportation infrastructure like roads need to be fixed and replaced due to the sheer number of cars that travel through them each day. By investing in transit, the city would not need to spend nearly as much money on things like road repair services by decentring car-related infrastructure. In the budget, this would reflect as a reduction in capital expenditures towards transportation, towards transit infrastructure.
What is the single worst traffic pinch point in Milton, and what is your fix?
No answer to this question.
Growth-related revenue is shrinking. Rank your preference: higher property taxes, more debt, deferred projects, or reduced service levels — and defend it.
No answer to this question.
What tax increase range do you consider acceptable for 2027, and what would justify exceeding it?
No answer to this question.
Name one Town expenditure you would cut, or one you would add.
No answer to this question.
Healthcare and schools are not municipal responsibilities, but residents feel the gaps locally. What is your advocacy plan, and how will residents measure whether it worked?
No answer to this question.
What is your position on the Milton Education Village's priorities and timeline?
No answer to this question.
What recreation or community facility gap would you prioritise next, and where?
No answer to this question.
How should council balance aggregate and quarry operations against groundwater and community concerns?
No answer to this question.
What is your commitment to rural Milton on roads, internet, and service equity?
No answer to this question.
Should Milton's urban boundary expand further within this term? Under what conditions?
No answer to this question.
Would you use, or support the use of, strong mayor powers? Under what circumstances?
No answer to this question.
What is one specific change you would make to how council engages residents between elections?
No answer to this question.
What does Milton need more right now — continuity or change — and why are you the answer?
No answer to this question.
How would you use the mayor's budget-proposal power differently than the status quo?
No answer to this question.
What is your working relationship plan with Halton Region, or its successor structure given the provincial regional-governance review?
No answer to this question.
Would you support large-scale data centres being developed in our municipality, and what would make you support or oppose a specific project?
No answer to this question.
How would you weigh the economic benefits of a data centre against its use of land, electricity, water, and other municipal infrastructure?
No answer to this question.
Should the municipality actively pursue data-centre investment, or only consider proposals as they come forward?
No answer to this question.
What they said in answer to the questions themselves is under Where they stand, question by question.
Many candidates campaign without a website. Its absence says nothing about them.
Written by other people, not by this site. Headlines and links only, with the outlet and date. Where a piece quotes them directly, that quotation is printed word for word and checked against the article it is attributed to.
None of this changes anything else on this page. A reporter’s summary is their compression of what was said, not the member’s own words, so nothing here is recorded as a position or compared against one. Where they are quoted directly, those words are theirs — and they are shown here rather than folded into a stance they did not write.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
They are named in this piece. It carries no direct quotation from them, so none is shown.
This is a record of what the Town certified and what the candidate publishes themselves. It contains no rating, ranking or endorsement, and no assessment of any candidate. Corrections are welcome and acted on within 48 hours — see the methodology page.
Everyone else on this ballot line, in alphabetical order.
16 of the 44 candidates who could be reached have answered the same 26 questions. Replies are open until Sunday 11 October 2026. 1 other candidate publishes no contact address anywhere, so they could not be asked. Read the answers, and who has answered → · the questions
One email a week with what moved on the record. No spam, one click to leave.